UK Covid Inquiry: Vaccine and Therapeutics (Module 4) (Jan 14-, Jan 31, 2023)
The inquiry seem to fail to answer key questions: about the efficacy and safety of the Covid vaccines, critics say. What transpired was a group of dissenting experts to hold 'The People's Vaccine Inquiry' on February 4th, 2023 where they presented their findings and concerns.
The official inquiry and its questioning was limited in scope, said Caroline Pover, Chair of the Trustee for UKCV, a charity for those who have been injured or bereaved by Covid vaccines, as only approved questions could be asked. “A lot of people have asked why certain questions didn’t come up … Which ones were raised … And which ones were present,” she added. In the course of the inquiry,
Lead Counsel Hugo Keith KC denoted vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) “Thrombosis with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome (TTS)” which some recyclers believe downplayed the knowledge of the bond between the vaccine and the situation.
Chair of Covid Inquiry - Baroness Heather Hallett
Dr. Jonathan Engler, a doctor and barrister, said that the inquiry’s chair, Baroness Hallett, cut off Kate Scott, whose husband has suffered a severe brain injury from a vaccine, saying that “science” must wait until experts were called to give evidence. Dr. Elizabeth Evans, ex-NHS doctor turned CEO of UK Medical Freedom Alliance, submitted evidence showing that most of the vaccination centres were not even achieving the most basic disclosure standards necessary for informed consent. She pointed out that the inquiry was meant to examine “vaccine delivery, roll-out procedures and public messaging” — but made no mention of this negligence.
Matt Hancock former Health Secretary
Hancock, admitted that the monitoring systems in place for vaccine adverse reactions were essentially a Phase 4 trial. But this statement was not subjected to the scrutiny it deserved during the inquiry.
Dr. Evans also hit public health authorities for using “coercive” tactics to encourage vaccination — from fearmongering to branding people who disagree with them as “anti-vaxxers.” She noted that government policies like lockdowns and curbs disproportionately affected kids, who weren’t significantly harmed by Covid in any case.
Dr. Ros Jones, retired Consultant Pediatricians, explained that the risk-benefit analysis around vaccinating children varied significantly with age and that a one-sizefitsall policy was inappropriate. Evidence about the harm caused by the vaccines already existed during the discussions between the MHRA, the JCVI and Chief Medical Officers and yet vaccine recommendations for children went ahead, she alleged.
Clare Craig - Chair of the Health Advisory & Recovery Team (HART
Clare Craig, a pathologist and Chair of the Health Advisory & Recovery Team (HART) who has written extensively on the models used to calculate likely vaccine effectiveness, which he said inflated both the risk of Covid and the potential benefit from taking the vaccine. The methodology considered vaccinated people unvaccinated for two weeks after they got vaccinated, which distorted the results to make vaccines look more effective, she said.
Professor Wei Shei Lem, Sir Jonathan Van Tam, and Dame June Raine
Nick Hunt, a former senior civil servant, said the MHRA functioned without “distinct lines that would tell you what is unacceptable harm” unlike the aviation or nuclear energy industries where there are strict thresholds that cannot be exceeded. He observed that the MHRA does not perform independent audits about safety, instead depending on internal compliance reviews.
Oncologist Dr Angus Dalgleish explained research showing a possible link between mRNA vaccines and cancer recurrence. Patients with stable melanoma he said began relapsing once they were given booster doses, he credits T-cell suppression. He cautioned about the presence of oncogenic potential SV40 sequences found in mRNA, and the fact they are linked to our vaccine-induced spike protein, which also binds to critical tumor suppressor genes.
In short, there is a lot of unprecedented international criticism of the official Covid Inquiry for how it seem to handle the vaccine-related topics, and countless experts presenting testimony on ethical breaches, woefully insufficient monitoring of safety issues as they arise, and long-term health concerns from the effects of the Covid vaccines
